On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote: > There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi > mmc/sdhci modules. kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752827 kernel-5.0.17-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752457 kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64 FAIL So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series. I can continue bisecting but a hint is welcome to reduce the number of steps. Maybe Stefan Wahren is not interested if it is a Fedora specific regression? (Then sure my testing may have fuzzy results etc. but I haven't noticed anything like that yet.) Jan The vanilla kernels I have built with: https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/aarch64-vanilla.patch As the official --with vanilla kernel.spec flag is buggy now: Error: rpmbuild -bs --with vanilla kernel.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547553 _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
