> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote: > > There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi > > mmc/sdhci modules. > > kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS > kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752827 > kernel-5.0.17-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752457 > kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64 FAIL > > So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series. > > I can continue bisecting but a hint is welcome to reduce the number of steps. > > Maybe Stefan Wahren is not interested if it is a Fedora specific regression? > > (Then sure my testing may have fuzzy results etc. but I haven't noticed > anything like that yet.) Have you tested 5.1.x like .12 or the latest 5.2rc5 releases? > > Jan > > > The vanilla kernels I have built with: > https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/aarch64-vanilla.patch > As the official --with vanilla kernel.spec flag is buggy now: > Error: rpmbuild -bs --with vanilla kernel.spec > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547553 _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
