On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 12:40 PM, fedora_arm <fedora_arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/16/2017 02:42 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:26 AM, fedora_arm >> <fedora_arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 07/15/2017 06:17 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>>> Fedora hasn't supported anything less than ARMv7 (armhfp) since Fedora 18. >>> Not what I was hoping. But lack of an armel build isn't a long term issue. >>> Do any contemporary Fedora ARM derivatives exist which may still maintain >>> armel build infrastructure? >> None I'm aware of, there's been a number of attempts for ARMv6 to >> support original RPi/Pi Zero but even they're mostly dead. > > Well this isn't exactly surprising for a server/workstation class > distribution to drop active support & soak for what has become > an obsolete/obsoleting embedded architecture. > > The sole reason in pursuing the possibility is Fedora distro SRPM > content being a strong preference as a distro intake choice for > this customer. The armel product is essentially in maintenance > mode and worst case would be to create a one-off build solution. > The practicality of that approach is what I'm trying to understand. > The only armel/armsfp RPM-based distribution I know of is Mageia (since Pignus is apparently not one). Their Mageia 6 release has an armv5tl flavor in addition to the standard armv7hl flavor. I think that armsfp is basically dead in most distributions, in part due to the abundance of armhfp hardware replacing the old armsfp stuff. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
