Re: Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-Rawhide-20170119.n.0-sda.raw.xz problems on CubieTruck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 02/01/2017 09:08 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dennis,

Thanks for the response.

On 01/30/2017 08:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El mié, 25-01-2017 a las 10:37 -0500, Robert Moskowitz escribió:
I build a CubieTruck image using the installer script with the
following
options:

    --target=Cubietruck --media=/dev/sdb --norootpass --selinux=OFF
--addconsole --resizefs
allwinner automatically outputs to the serial console without a boot
argument to set it, that step is not necessary.

I guess just one of those things you have to know.  So far, all I am working
with are allwinner boards.

Will add this to my notes.


I booted up the image with a UDB keyboard and VGA monitor attached
plus
the TTY console.

After I logged into the console as root, I set the root password,
and
added myself as a user.  I then used this userID to log into the Xfce
login.

Next I did 'dnf update'  Of course this took time to run.  But a
VERY
long time between the cleanup and verify phases.  During these I got
the
message:


Image Name:   4.10.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc26.armv7hl
Created:      Wed Jan 25 10:04:59 2017
Image Type:   ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed)
Data Size:    6054568 Bytes = 5912.66 kB = 5.77 MB
Load Address: 00008000
Entry Point:  00008000
Image Name:   initramfs
Created:      Wed Jan 25 10:05:01 2017
Image Type:   ARM Linux RAMDisk Image (uncompressed)
Data Size:    16525173 Bytes = 16137.86 kB = 15.76 MB
Load Address: 00000000
Entry Point:  00000000
dracut: Disabling early microcode, because kernel does not support
it.
CONFIG_MICROCODE_[AMD|INTEL]!=y


eventually the update finished.  The system SEEMS to be working, but
what is with this message?
What part of the message?  the dracut part is a message saying that an
x86 only opton for firmware patching is not set. it is just noise on
non x86 but could be useful on x86. the other messages are from
mkimage, for historical reasons we make wrapped kernels and initramfs's
which we do not actually use.

So basically I just ignore this.  But it seemed that dracut ran a very long
time before it spit out this information and finished up. Like it was not
happy about something and finally gave up.
It's not just dracut, it's the install of the contents of the rpm and
then the dracut process that generates the new host specific initrd.
It's a IO heavy task.

Thanks for explaining this.

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux