Re: Fedora on Raspberry Pi [Was: Raspberry Pi 2 and VC4 firmware license]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> > Seems like there's not much that's left to be done for stock Fedora
>> > to
>> > boot on Raspberry Pi 2 successfully [1].
>>
>> There's not much, I've
>>
>> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308355
>> >
>> > One bit that notably prevents us from spinning an image that would
>> > boot
>> > on RPi2 board solely from the Fedora packages is the VC4 firmware.
>>
>> Yes, it's one, there's a bunch of others, the kernel now should be
>> mostly upstream, it's on my list (it's very long) to enable this and
>> test it.
>
> Is there anything I could do to help with that?
>
>> We also need to be able to use u-boot so that we can do
>> standard kernel upgrades/rollbacks as well as deal with the fact the
>> firmware needs a VFAT partition without having to have the confusion
>> and QA of twice the amount of images produced
>>
>> > It seems to have a license [2] that's not compatible with Fedora's
>> > "Redistributable, no modification permitted" license for binary
>> > firmware blobs: it seems to have a usage restriction:
>>
>> We spoke with the RPi foundation about this years ago to get some
>> adjustments made for distro distribution, and then Legal and got the
>> appropriate exceptions, then the board (as it was then) to get the
>> approval there. Basically the work has been done already and firmware
>> has been packaged in Fedora since last June [1].
>>
>> [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/bcm283x-firmware.git
>>
>> > > * This software may only be used for the purposes of developing
>> > > for,
>> > >   running or using a Raspberry Pi device.
>> >
>> > [2] https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/blob/master/boot/LICENC
>> > E.broadcom
>> >
>> > The way to go now seems to be to spin a remix with the firmware
>> > added.
>> >
>> > Does it make sense to talk to Broadcom or Raspberry Pi
>> > Foundation/Ltd
>> > and asking them to lift the restriction? I doubt it would cause any
>> > practical difference to them. Does anyone have a contact at
>> > Broadcom or
>> > Raspberry Pi I could talk to?
>>
>> We had those conversations well over 2 years ago long before the v2
>> was announced.
>
> This is excellent news!
>
> Please pardon my ignorance; last time I checked the package was not
> there; but I surely haven't re-checked for a couple of months.

Been there for 8 months or so:

$ dnf list bcm283x-firmware
Last metadata expiration check performed 2:50:44 ago on Mon Feb 15
14:38:22 2016.
Available Packages
bcm283x-firmware.armv7hl   20151219-1.1efc1ec.fc23       updates
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux