Fedora on Raspberry Pi [Was: Raspberry Pi 2 and VC4 firmware license]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Peter,

On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 12:02 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Lubomir,
> 
> > Seems like there's not much that's left to be done for stock Fedora
> > to
> > boot on Raspberry Pi 2 successfully [1].
> 
> There's not much, I've
> 
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308355
> > 
> > One bit that notably prevents us from spinning an image that would
> > boot
> > on RPi2 board solely from the Fedora packages is the VC4 firmware.
> 
> Yes, it's one, there's a bunch of others, the kernel now should be
> mostly upstream, it's on my list (it's very long) to enable this and
> test it.

Is there anything I could do to help with that?

> We also need to be able to use u-boot so that we can do
> standard kernel upgrades/rollbacks as well as deal with the fact the
> firmware needs a VFAT partition without having to have the confusion
> and QA of twice the amount of images produced
> 
> > It seems to have a license [2] that's not compatible with Fedora's
> > "Redistributable, no modification permitted" license for binary
> > firmware blobs: it seems to have a usage restriction:
> 
> We spoke with the RPi foundation about this years ago to get some
> adjustments made for distro distribution, and then Legal and got the
> appropriate exceptions, then the board (as it was then) to get the
> approval there. Basically the work has been done already and firmware
> has been packaged in Fedora since last June [1].
> 
> [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/bcm283x-firmware.git
> 
> > > * This software may only be used for the purposes of developing
> > > for,
> > >   running or using a Raspberry Pi device.
> > 
> > [2] https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/blob/master/boot/LICENC
> > E.broadcom
> > 
> > The way to go now seems to be to spin a remix with the firmware
> > added.
> > 
> > Does it make sense to talk to Broadcom or Raspberry Pi
> > Foundation/Ltd
> > and asking them to lift the restriction? I doubt it would cause any
> > practical difference to them. Does anyone have a contact at
> > Broadcom or
> > Raspberry Pi I could talk to?
> 
> We had those conversations well over 2 years ago long before the v2
> was announced.

This is excellent news!

Please pardon my ignorance; last time I checked the package was not
there; but I surely haven't re-checked for a couple of months.

We're doing a Fedora rebuild for the older BCM2835-based Raspberry Pi
boards and this will help us shorten the diff to Fedora. (Didn't
announce a release yet yet, and are still getting the infrastructure
done, but have some bootable images ready).

https://pignus.computer/

> Peter
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux