Re: Not working as advertised - Re: System time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 09/02/2015 10:51 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Dennis Gilmore wrote:

I would really like to know the use cases where chronyd is
not sufficient and the problems that people are trying to
solve.
Don't the reasons include ( as in a IoT unit with only
occasional external network access to a timesource ):
	1. avoidance of unnecessary FSCK's due to 'elapsed
	time since last check'

Why I change my fstab to disable this!

	2. permitting cacheing, and then cache expiration of
	potential reliable nameserver information (needed to
	'boot-strap' into reaching a timeserver array)

-- Russ herrold

ps: hi, Dennis -- long time, no see
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux