Peter&Andrew, Thanks for your quick response! I agree with Peter that 1.8 is definitely our future. But unfortunately, I haven't steadily reproduced this issues yet, and I have no much time to reproduce at present, thus I am seeking other options. If older version can resolve this issue, I would like to have a try. If the issue is reproduce, I'll open a bug. Deepak, could you tell me when I can find openjdk7? Again, thank you all! Fenghua -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx] 发送时间: 2015年4月7日 20:51 收件人: Andrew Dinn 抄送: 胡风华(一蜚); arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deepak Bhole 主题: Re: Do we have workable Java 1.7.x for aarch64? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Dinn <adinn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Fenghua & Peter, > > On 07/04/15 12:08, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> I am using openjdk 1.8.0, but in some cases I got core dump, I >>> highly suspect it’s due to java’s version. Thus I want to try lower >>> version openjdk. Who can tell me if 1.7.x works well with aarch64? >>> If so where can I get it? Thanks a lot! >> >> No we don't, if you've got issues with openjdk 8 on aarch64 you >> should report a bug [1] with details of how to reproduce it. The >> maintainers are responsive. The work done with openjdk7 on aarch64 >> was small and the real work on the port was done with openjdk8 so >> you'd have more luck with that anyway > > Strictly, Peter's advice is out of date. I back-ported all the > relevant code we first implemented in JDK8 last year. So we have had a > fully equivalent JDK7 implementation as of mid-December 2014. So, if > you really want a fully functional and optimized JDK7 you can at the > very least build and install one from the sources in the IcedTea2.5 > mercurial repo on icedtea.classpath.org. I was referring to Fedora shipping variants, not upstream, this is a Fedora ARM list afterall ;-) > I am afraid that I am not sure about the status and availability of > rpms/tarballs of releases of JDK7 for current versions of RHEL/Fedora. > Deepak Bhole (Java team manager in cc-list) is better placed to answer > questions about distribution issues. Fedora 20 was the last release we shipped OpenJDK7 for and the first release in which we supported aarch64 was Fedora 21 and hence my point of us in Fedora only supporting OpenJDK8. If he wants to go and get it from upstream and build it himself I'm sure the above is fine but I doubt he wants to do that! > That said, Peter is right to suggest that we are very keen to receive > bug reports for any failings observed in the JDK8 release. Please > report the issue and provide us with a reproducer. We will do our very > best to fix it as soon as we can. > > regards, > > > Andrew Dinn > ----------- > Senior Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat UK Ltd > Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 > Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Matt Parson (USA), Charlie Peters > (USA), Michael O'Neill (Ireland) _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
