Why bother releasing an image that is not functional. I am a big fedora fan & promoter, but I went
to debian wheezy 7.2 for my BBB ham radio setup. I create HR rpm's for arm systems and
Pidora 19 alpa is a disappointment with the repository in a mess, too many 'missing requires' ;
No ftdi support in the base image kernel, not able to update kernel getting 'obsoleted' etc.
I can install my rpms ok, but cannot connect a ftdi device to use it.
I intend to do this software in rpm's for Pidora 19 & BBB > Fedora 20 when it is ready.
I wonder why Debian are so far in front of Fedora on these fronts?
Fedora always had a reputation for great hardware support, but not here not now.
Adrian ... vk4tux
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx>
To: arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: F20 Beta-5 on BeagleBone Black
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:41:06 -0600
El Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:20:43 +0100 Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> escribió: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:09:47AM -0500, Robert Knight wrote: > > > I used a Fedora 20 Beta system running on a x86_64, running > > minicom, to connect to the BeagleBone Black through a USB serial > > adapter. I was trying to provide enough details so that the > > experiment could be repeated. > > OK. But my problem is that the BBB not even seems to start booting > with the F20 image, even none of the USR LEDs turn on. > > When booting the Debian image in exactly the same way (even the same > microSD card), the LEDs turn on after a second or so (and then I > release the boot button) and Debian boots fine. > > I have currently nothing attached to the BBB, only a network cable and > a power cable (USB or external, I tried both in both scenarios). > Could that be a problem?
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
