Re: Improved support for BeagleBone (Black) for Fedora 20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:58:01PM -0400, Jason Kridner wrote:
>>> Did you know that BeagleBone Black is *true* open hardware? This means
>>> that people can readily take the design and make their own custom
>>> changes to it even prototyping it in low quantities, such as being
>>> supported for the upcoming Arduino TRE. The same can't be said for
>>> some other boards in the same price range also looking to get Linux in
>>> the hands of more people.
>>>
>>> It is also $35 to distributors and those including it in other open
>>> hardware projects.
>>>
>>> OK, it might not have been best for me to start with a sales pitch,
>>> but it seems to me a lot of people aren't aware.
>>>
>>> I'd like to figure out who has interest in improving Fedora support on
>>> BeagleBone Black and what I can do to help them. We have a running
>>> image of Fedora...
>>>
>>> http://beagleboard.org/fedora has a bit more information on that as
>>> well as the desired end experience
>>>
>>> ...but there are a lot of things that need to be done to try to make
>>> it more appealing to expose more "makers" to Linux.
>>>
>>> First and foremost, support needs to be in the Fedora mainline, not on
>>> a remix. I'd be very happy if I was copied on any blocking issues in
>>> that regard so that I can help get them addressed.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks! I've got a trimmed down patchset that I'm ready to apply to
>> Fedora for it, just waiting on some test results and some config tweaks,
>> and then we should be good to go on F-20. I'll let you know as soon as
>> we have images for you.
>
> fyi-
>
> Kyle, as i haven't seen your patchset/config
>
> If you happened to start with our reference 3.12 config from
> github.com/beagleboard/kernel there was an issues where the usb host
> port was not working..  That has now just been fixed, essentially
> disabling: CONFIG_USB_OTG_WHITELIST

We've had it set as such for quite some time already.

Peter
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux