Re: Running autoreconf for aarch64 support, why ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/04/2013 12:19 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hmm, I can clearly remember rpmbuild doing the same thing in the
past (way back in the past I must admit). But given that this is clearly
a way better fix then modifying a gazillion packages, I'm glad we've it
back!

Yes, evidently this feature was around a long time ago but was turned off for some number of years.

That does mean I've likely done the work on the 22 packages where I've
already added autoreconf calls for nothing, ah well. I guess it is best
to probably revert the changes there ?

Not exactly- it would be preferable if all packagers ran autoreconf as a matter of course. This will ensure future changes to autoconf are picked up, even when building without redhat-rpm-config installed.

Are there any cases where this is expected to not be fixed by the
new redhat-rpm-config ?

Anywhere that %configure isn't used will still need to be updated. It's a much smaller list!

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux