Hi,
On 05/04/2013 07:50 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
While working on my Fedora packages, I noticed that
%configure replaces config.guess and config.sub with
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess and
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.sub, ie:
+ for i in '$(find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub)'
++ basename ./lib-src/libresample/config.guess
+ '[' -f /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess ']'
+ /usr/bin/rm -f ./lib-src/libresample/config.guess
++ basename ./lib-src/libresample/config.guess
+ /usr/bin/cp -fv /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess
./lib-src/libresample/config
'/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess' -> './lib-src/libresample/config.guess'
+ for i in '$(find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub)'
++ basename ./config.sub
+ '[' -f /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.sub ']'
+ /usr/bin/rm -f ./config.sub
++ basename ./config.sub
+ /usr/bin/cp -fv /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.sub ./config.sub
'/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.sub' -> './config.sub'
+ for i in '$(find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub)'
++ basename ./config.guess
+ '[' -f /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess ']'
+ /usr/bin/rm -f ./config.guess
++ basename ./config.guess
+ /usr/bin/cp -fv /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess ./config.guess
'/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess' -> './config.guess'
So why do we need to run autoreconf to update these, if they are
replaced anyways ???
That feature has only just landed in Fedora, we filed the bugs long
before hand, we're in the process of reviewing all packages that would
be fixed by the above feature and those bugs will be closed once we
do.
Hmm, I can clearly remember rpmbuild doing the same thing in the
past (way back in the past I must admit). But given that this is clearly
a way better fix then modifying a gazillion packages, I'm glad we've it
back!
That does mean I've likely done the work on the 22 packages where I've
already added autoreconf calls for nothing, ah well. I guess it is best
to probably revert the changes there ?
Are there any cases where this is expected to not be fixed by the
new redhat-rpm-config ?
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
