On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:24:47PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > On 01/29/2013 03:10 PM, Mark Salter wrote: > >On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 11:23 -0700, Al Stone wrote: > >>On 01/29/2013 11:09 AM, Mark Salter wrote: > >>>On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 14:12 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: > >>>>On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52:24AM -0500, Mark Salter wrote: > >>>>>On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 09:05 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: > >>>>>>Thanks, Mark. I've switched to another machine which has better network > >>>>>>connection. And It finally works, :) I guess something I've checkout before > >>>>>>was corrupt due to both my poor network connection and big size of the > >>>>>>rootfs. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>BTW, seems it is not up-to-date? I mean there is no /stage3 under the rootfs. > >>>>> > >>>>>Hmm. I looked closer at the tree I checked out and it too had a head at > >>>>>commit 3e7ab1bee31082a0 from Al on Dec 31. I'm at a loss to explain what > >>>>It is the same with my local git tree. > >>>> > >>>>>is going wrong. I have a local tree that appears to be up to date with > >>>>>the repo on fedoraproject.org but the log shows 18 commits which aren't > >>>>>in the tree I cloned from fedoraproject.org repo earlier today. I'll try > >>>>>and see if I can sort it all out tomorrow. > >>>>Thanks a lot. > >>>> > >>>> Baozi > >>> > >>>Al, this may be something for you to look at. If I clone the repo using > >>>http, I get 3e7ab1bee31082a as the lastest commit. If I use ssh+git, I > >>>get everything correctly. > >>> > >>>--Mark > >>> > >>> > >> > >>The only thing I can think of right now is that 'git update-server-info' > >>may not be getting run on updates to the repo for some reason. I've > >>run it by hand to see if this changes the behavior -- let me know if > >>you now get the most recent commit. If not, I'll have to poke the > >>infrastructure folks. The short term workaround is to use ssh+git, > >>as you indicated. > >> > >>Infrastructure and I have been struggling with the underlying problem > >>that http and git and SELinux are in a bit of a disagreement on how > >>access should work -- and it's http that's been losing out so far. > > > >Yay. A clone using http did get the latest bits. > > > > Well, we now know the workaround; do the commit, then ssh into fp.o and > run git update-server-info in the repo. Ugly, but it works. > > I'm not sure this is fixable, but I'll poke the infrastructure folks > and see what we can do. > Thanks Al & Mark! I used my fedorapeople account to clone using ssh. But it seems http is still not work, :( Anyway, there is a way for me fetch the latest change. The new problem is when I ran ./stage3 script it shows the following error report: script2makefile:34: /stage3/stage3.mk/texinfo.mk: No such file or directory Building intltool intltool: src RPM not found make: *** [done/intltool] Error 1 I guess not all the src RPM to be built in stage3 is included in the "/SRPMS"? Is there any TODO list of stage3 src RPM including the location to get them? Thus, I may help part of building progress. Thanks. Cheers, Baozi _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
