On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 22:00 -0800, Sean Omalley wrote: > Why not just add the device tree to uboot? Then when the system gets > to uboot, it already has a device tree, and you just have to map it to > the os? Then you don't have to ship 1000 dtb files and probe the 32 > different revs of the same named board. You leave it up to the user to > get the right file. You merely just map the device tree in uboot to > the OS. Or is that what you are saying? :) The DTBs are in a state of flux. This is temporary during the transition, but this transition is going to go on for a while, and we will need to carefully match DTB and kernel versions for the foreseeable future. I think this indicates that we should put them in a package required by the kernel, which will allow us to update the kernel and DTBs in lockstep for now but gives us the flexibility to stop updating the DTBs (or update less frequently) once they stop churning. -Chris _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm