On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I don't see how Fedora 17 ARM on the pandaboard ES is broken > > Peter, > > Since you quote my e-mail, I feel the need to clarify... I wasn't > speaking about F17/ARM, just making a broad generalization as to > 'release' software being more like 'beta', as often there's several > fixes released shortly thereafter, meaning that the 'beta' wasn't as > wide as it should have been. It was a comment on the fast-paced nature > of software development nowadays, rather than a criticism of F17/ARM. > > And second, when I used the word "broken" it was in reference to > software branded "alpha". > > Please, re-read my message and you'll surely understand it now. I read it in the context of the thread, if it wasn't meant in the context of the thread it's off topic. Peter _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
