On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Phoronix is of course not always on the mark, but their results seem to >> suggest there's a config issue in the Fedora kernel regarding the >> OMAP4460 core used in the Pandaboard ES - apparently cpufreq support is >> lacking, and consequently the CPU doesn't run at full speed. The >> benchmarks seem to confirm this. > > I knew waiting a few weeks before installing F17 ARM on my PandaBoard > ES was a wise idea... ;) > GA code nowadays means "beta". Beta means "Alpha" and "Alpha" means > "broken". ;-P I don't see how Fedora 17 ARM on the pandaboard ES is broken what so ever, not as fast as it could be is not the same as broken. The article doesn't mention anywhere stability issues and we've already enabled the kernel option and are reviewing the other bits available. Peter _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
