Re: Possible kernel config issue with Pandaboard ES (Phoronix)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/05/2012 06:31 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Adam Williamson<awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Phoronix is of course not always on the mark, but their results seem to
suggest there's a config issue in the Fedora kernel regarding the
OMAP4460 core used in the Pandaboard ES - apparently cpufreq support is
lacking, and consequently the CPU doesn't run at full speed. The
benchmarks seem to confirm this.

I knew waiting a few weeks before installing F17 ARM on my PandaBoard
ES was a wise idea... ;)
GA code nowadays means "beta". Beta means "Alpha" and "Alpha" means
"broken". ;-P

Depends on your stability scale. I see Fedora as being pre-alpha on the RHEL stability scale. :)

Gordan
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux