On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:52:49PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 05/15/2012 01:05 PM, Jon Masters wrote: >>> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> Not a beta blocker, but please make sure we add "new linker path" to the >>> final requirements before GA. Since we'll have a compat symlink there >>> will not be any impact to users. >> >> >> What's left to be done on this? Do we need a glibc update? > >My understanding was we needed a new gcc and a new glibc and the two >relevant maintainers were awaiting the various bits to hit mainline >and once they did it would be dutifully applied and pushed. Hi, gcc [1] and glibc [2] patches have been accepted upstream already so I'm hoping things should be ready to go soon. Be aware that even with a compat symlink you're likely to need an extra glibc patch unless you rebuild the world. [3] [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=186859 [2] http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2012-05/msg00050.html [3] http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/cross-distro/2012-April/000263.html Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre steve.mcintyre@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
