Re: Fedora 17 GA blocker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 01:05 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Not a beta blocker, but please make sure we add "new linker path" to the
>> final requirements before GA. Since we'll have a compat symlink there
>> will not be any impact to users.
>
>
> What's left to be done on this?  Do we need a glibc update?

My understanding was we needed a new gcc and a new glibc and the two
relevant maintainers were awaiting the various bits to hit mainline
and once they did it would be dutifully applied and pushed.

Peter
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux