Re: ARMv5 and atomic operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brendan Conoboy píše v Po 23. 04. 2012 v 09:03 -0700: 
> On 04/23/2012 08:06 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > the main problem no only in ARM land is that many software developers
> > like to develop their own atomic ops implementations in their project
> > instead of using some standard one eg. from GCC :-( I fight with this
> > problem again and again on s390 ...
> 
> Are the fixes you're introducing s390 specific?  Would love to reuse 
> existing solutions if they're not already in use.

I'm usually skipping such packages as there is a lot of other work on
s390, but when I dealt with them I've used either the gcc or C++
primitives or the atomic_ops library. The Pixie package seems to be on
my list of blocked by atomic ops, there should be more, but I haven't
analysed all failures yet.


Dan


_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux