Nicolas Pitre píše v Po 23. 04. 2012 v 10:56 -0400: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > > As we get closer to having 100% package coverage in F17-ARM we're running into > > harder build failures due to the limitations of the chips we're building for. > > The problem I've noticed on many of the recent failures is due to the lack of > > atomic operations (These didn't arrive until ARMv6). How do we want to handle > > this? I see a few options: > > This is already handled, and has been so for the last 5 years or more. > > The kernel provides user space with atomic helpers which the kernel > knows how to replay if necessary to make the result completely "atomic". > See Documentation/arm/kernel_user_helpers.txt in the kernel source tree > for details and example usage. > > These helpers are usually called via some libraries providing standard > APIs and semantics. The NPTL implementation of pthreads for ARMv5 is > based on those helpers. And gcc's handling of atomic types is also > using those kernel helpers when compiling for ARMv5, or even ARMv6 > (non ARMv6k) in the 64-bit case. > > So everything is there for you already to support atomic operations even > on ARMv3 if you so wish. the main problem no only in ARM land is that many software developers like to develop their own atomic ops implementations in their project instead of using some standard one eg. from GCC :-( I fight with this problem again and again on s390 ... Dan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
