On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:41 -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html > > > > Cool! > > > > What is the plan for reconciling the differences? > > > > A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning: > > > ... > > glibc: Both have arm patches, but are they the same patches? > > I started looking at 2.14.7.arm0 (v5) vs 2.13.90.9.0.arm1 (v7) this > morning. It is not clear to me if glibc-2.14.7.arm0 does have arm > specific patches. 2.13.90.9.0.arm1 does have: > > glibc-arm-mathdefs.patch > glibc-arm-tzdata.patch > glibc-arm-clone-unwind.patch I have been running an armv7hl glibc 2.14-7 for the last few days and haven't found any problems with it. It is the same as the 2.14-7.arm0 package with the addition of the arm-clone-unwind.patch and the patch for http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10103 I put the src rpm at http://msalter.fedorapeople.org/arm/ If someone could build this and try it out on armv5tel and it doesn't break anything, then I think we can start using it for both builds. --Mark _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
