On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html Cool! What is the plan for reconciling the differences? A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning: gcc: There are patches in the armv7hl build that affect volatile bitfields and memory consumption. The lack of the volatile bitfield patch may result in a few broken packages on armv5tel while the absence of the memory consumption patch may result in some packages failing to build. glibc: Both have arm patches, but are they the same patches? rpm: Special armv7hl handling was required. Is this as upstream acceptable as it's going to be for the foreseeable future? -- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
