Re: Fedora 16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/26/2011 10:34 AM, omalleys@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Can we get away with taking a snapshot of the F15 base and F15 Updates
> trees, and merge them and call that F15 base?

Keeping F15 updates spinning during the F17 work is a sensible thing to 
do as we could really use a stable ARM Fedora release to work from. 
This would hopefully look like F15 plus some updates (i.e., what koji 
produces from an F15 mass rebuild) as GA, then a seperate updates 
repository.  Hopefully any changes that go into F17 during development 
will end up as updates in F15 since F15 will still be supported until 
F17 is released.

-- 
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux