Niels de Vos <devos@...> writes: > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Peter Robinson > <pbrobinson@...> wrote: > >> The glibc issue is interesting... it seems its a regression from F-13, > >> we had to apply a patch for F-13 but even with all that in place I > >> still get some failures. So it seems to be a regression (and we're > >> seeing it on the F-15 glibc one as well. I'll do some more testing and > >> follow up with the logs etc so that someone more smart than I am might > >> be able to comment and assist > >> > >> All help and feedback welcome :-D > > I've managed to build the F14 glibc on F13: > - https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96723 > > If someone finds some time to test, please leave a note in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708452 or on this list. If > there are any issues, I'll try to have a look at them. > > Cheers, > Niels > I have noticed that forward movement for F14 and or F15 for the armv5tel hasnt had much attention and that the focus is moving torward the newer boards. I would like greatly to be able to provide some help in this area and if some one contacted me, I would love to ask many questions and provide hours of compile and research time to provide a footfs for F14 and or F15 :) What Constitutes a F14-F15 build over F12? What Packages denotes a fedora build? What Design Denotes a fedora build? I have a few sheevaplugs and I am currently running F12 with kernel 2.6.39.1 # uname -a Linux www 2.6.39.1 #1 PREEMPT Mon Jun 20 08:29:56 EDT 2011 armv5tel armv5tel armv5tel GNU/Linux Sincerly, Eager and Willing Redhat User :) _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
