> It seems that the smsc95xx module can not be kept responsible for the > bad performance of your drive. The opposite seems to be true - activity in the smsc95xx module *improves* performance. It still smells like a missing interrupt (or poll) problem, but I still don't know where... > Other points that might investigation, > include the USB-controller on your PandaBoard (ehci, ohci, ...) or [ 1833.619598] usb 1-1.3: new full speed USB device using ehci-omap and address 6 [ 2318.736450] usb 1-1.3: new high speed USB device using ehci-omap and address 7 [ 2695.448394] usb 1-1.3: new full speed USB device using ehci-omap and address 8 ehci-omap is built in to the kernel. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
