On 24/05/11 19:39, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 05/24/2011 06:37 PM, Adam Goode wrote: >> Have a look at this too: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation >> >> It was supposed to be the way forward regarding all this. Last I >> checked, it was only for applications, not libraries, though. > > Now that _IS_ interesting. So NSS is the consolidation target? As an aside, it is *incredibly* annoying that "NSS" is used as the name for this, since NSS already has a different meaning on GNU/Linux systems: Name Service Switch. But anyway... > I was under the impression that OpenSSL is a lot more prolific and > it has more application level support, of the ones listed on the > page above, at least the following: Perhaps, but its licence seems to be broken, so it can't be used as a general-purpose crypto library for Fedora. Andrew. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
