On 05/24/2011 06:37 PM, Adam Goode wrote: > Have a look at this too: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation > > It was supposed to be the way forward regarding all this. Last I > checked, it was only for applications, not libraries, though. Now that _IS_ interesting. So NSS is the consolidation target? I was under the impression that OpenSSL is a lot more prolific and it has more application level support, of the ones listed on the page above, at least the following: 1) Apache/mod_ssl (OK, this one's a tie since there's also mod_nss) 3) stunnel 5) wget 8) OpenLDAP 9) OpenSSH 14) postfix So despite the effort to head in the direction of NSS, there are still more applications supporting OpenSSL than NSS out of the box (and some of those will build against either). IMO, that is a very good reason to go with OpenSSL, especially since pushing this sort of thing upstream can sometimes approximate herding cats. But assuming I'm wasting my breath with that line of discussion, on a more pragmatic level - what is the NSS support for cryptodev like? Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
