Re: armv7hl requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jon Masters <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 00:09 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Jon Masters wrote:
> We can optimize for A9+ VFPv3-D16 and then there can be packages that
> are D32 later on, but I suspect it would be more likely that one would
> create optimized NEON binaries and perhaps one day switch to a D32 base
> set of configuration flags once nobody is using D16 v7 devices.

Marvell ARMADA 200 series and Tegra2...

> Philippe: If I'm crazy, let me know ;)


Matt Sealey <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Product Development Analyst, Genesi USA, Inc.
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux