On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jon Masters wrote: >> If you read how VFPv3 actually implements its registers, you'll see that >> the extra 16 (for D32) really are totally separate anyway as far as the >> ABI is concerned, so I remain unconvinced we lose a lot by being D16. > > Can you clarify that? Does that mean that a we can have a D16 distro > with D32 kernel/glibc? VFPv3-D16 and VFPv3-D32 code are compatible. You can call D16 code from D32 code and vice-versa. -- Michael _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
