Re: llvm/clang support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:50 AM,  <omalleys@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Did anyone ever get llvm/clang working?
>
> It -says- it is fast, good optimization, faster binaries, aimed at
> generating better errors, and has good tools for debugging. :) the
> darwin-arm (and x86 ports are production quality.
> There isn't support for EABI or < armv6 in the ARM-backend yet.

I'm having a bit of a look at this for Linaro at the moment.  LLVM is
quite respectable, and generates code that is slower than GCC but
generally in the same ballpark.  Of the three benchmarks I've tried,
two took 8 % longer to run on an A9 and pybench took more like 40 %
longer to run.  pybench is sensitive to having a good inner loop
though.

-- Michael
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux