Re: Bug process for arch-specific bugs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/25/2011 08:28 PM, Matthew Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please could someone point me to / summarise the process for secondary
> arch-specific bugs?  I'll raise issues on bugzilla if appropriate, but
> I wanted to check if there's something specific for Fedora ARM when
> the issue doesn't occur on i386 / x86_64.
>
> (The specific issue is with Firefox:  Ubuntu have seen this one too
> [1], but the fix of playing with -O2 / -O doesn't have any effect on
> F13 -- unsurprisingly.)

Usually just report it on bugzilla.redhat.com and set the arch as arm9. 
That's what I do. But my experience with FF is that it tends to get 
pushed upstream.

Gordan
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux