Hi Matthew, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Matthew Wilson <mj.wilson.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please could someone point me to / summarise the process for secondary > arch-specific bugs? ÂI'll raise issues on bugzilla if appropriate, but > I wanted to check if there's something specific for Fedora ARM when > the issue doesn't occur on i386 / x86_64. By default the package needs to be fixed/updated by the package maintainers, interacting with them is normally done over bugzilla. So the best way is to open bugs against the package. Make sure that the packager/developer knows how to build (test)packages for ARM so that you can offer to test, and they can build them: - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Package_Maintainers When you file bugs, make sure that you set the bug 'ARMTracker' as a blocker. This will make it possible to list all the ARM-affecting bugs in a nice way: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=ARMTracker&hide_resolved=1 I hope this helps you and wish you good luck! Cheers, Niels _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
