On 03/08/2011 09:04 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:01:02AM +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote: >> Niels de Vos wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> it looks like not all Fedora 13 packages can be build on ARM yet. For >>> some packages there have been tickets opened at the Trac instance: >>> - https://fedorahosted.org/arm/report/1 >>> >>> I'd like to help out with building these packages, but am not a >>> 'proven packager' [1], so I can not fix the issues completely and rely >>> on the package maintainer or other proven packagers. What I am doing >>> right now is filing bugs against the packages that can not be build on >>> ARM. I'm including pointers to the issue and propose fixes, like: >>> - Bug 682515 - libgda-4.1.4-1.fc13.src.rpm does not rebuild on Fedora 13 for ARM >>> - Bug 682538 - geos-3.2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm does not build on Fedora-13 for ARM >>> >>> These bugs are blockers for the ARMTracker which make them easily findable: >>> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=245418&hide_resolved=1 >> >> We're tracking build failures as bugs now? Really?? > > Tracking build failures is probably overkill as long as not all packages > are expected to build on ARM. Aren't all the packages expected to build on ARM? Which ones aren't expected to build? > Tracking patches in Bugzilla that fix > build failures is a good idea, though. This allows maintainers to > inspect patches and apply them. > > I guess once Fedora-ARM is completely working, all non-working packages > should be tracked as mentioned in the wiki: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#Tracker_Bugs That seems contradictory. Once it is completely working, that implies all packages are working, in which case there's nothing to fix/track. Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
