Niels de Vos wrote: > Hello all, > > it looks like not all Fedora 13 packages can be build on ARM yet. For > some packages there have been tickets opened at the Trac instance: > - https://fedorahosted.org/arm/report/1 > > I'd like to help out with building these packages, but am not a > 'proven packager' [1], so I can not fix the issues completely and rely > on the package maintainer or other proven packagers. What I am doing > right now is filing bugs against the packages that can not be build on > ARM. I'm including pointers to the issue and propose fixes, like: > - Bug 682515 - libgda-4.1.4-1.fc13.src.rpm does not rebuild on Fedora 13 for ARM > - Bug 682538 - geos-3.2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm does not build on Fedora-13 for ARM > > These bugs are blockers for the ARMTracker which make them easily findable: > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=245418&hide_resolved=1 We're tracking build failures as bugs now? Really?? If build failures are now tracked as bugs, OpenOffice/LibreOffice would probably be an important one to address sooner rather than later. I have 3.3.0.4 from rawhide _almost_ building when configured without the Java bits, but it fails in the packaging stage, erroneously trying to extract non-existant beanshell components. Without OO/LO, we haven't got a usable office package on ARM, which is a bit of an issue. And since Ubuntu have it working, we really ought to be keeping up. The main thing that's stopping me from making progress on this at a sensible rate is that OO/LO takes 3 or so days to build on my Sheevaplug. Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
