On 01/07/2011 11:13 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > Guys, it is as I suspected: > > Before building dietlibc (with my patches (posted to bugzilla), without > which it won't build at all): > > User: 0 > System: 1 > Skipped: 0 > Half: 0 > Word: 0 > DWord: 1 > Multi: 0 > User faults: 3 (fixup+warn) > > > After building dietlibc and running it's test suite: > > User: 1012877 > System: 1 > Skipped: 0 > Half: 0 > Word: 0 > DWord: 1 > Multi: 0 > User faults: 3 (fixup+warn) > > I don't think there can be any doubt any more about where the previos > astronomically high number of misalignments came from. This also means > that the chances of properly running dietlibc on ARM, at least with > decent performance without hardware alignment fixing are pretty low. Probably, although there may be only one bug (say in memcpy) for all we know. Andrew. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
