Guys, it is as I suspected: Before building dietlibc (with my patches (posted to bugzilla), without which it won't build at all): User: 0 System: 1 Skipped: 0 Half: 0 Word: 0 DWord: 1 Multi: 0 User faults: 3 (fixup+warn) After building dietlibc and running it's test suite: User: 1012877 System: 1 Skipped: 0 Half: 0 Word: 0 DWord: 1 Multi: 0 User faults: 3 (fixup+warn) I don't think there can be any doubt any more about where the previos astronomically high number of misalignments came from. This also means that the chances of properly running dietlibc on ARM, at least with decent performance without hardware alignment fixing are pretty low. Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
