On 01/08/2011 11:14 AM, Andy Green wrote: > Having a policy that alignment faults should be avoided itself is fine, > but it is not a replacement for the good assertive action made by > changing the runtime policy. To some extent I agree. But the policy should be aimed toward finding and reporting these bugs, not toward glazing over the problem. To that end, I am in favour of setting alignment to 1 rather than 3 as default. > In fact I don't think we get to this point > with so few fixups unless that was already the general policy not just > here but in the upstreams. Any policy of not fixing things like this should arguably be grounds for excluding the package from the distribution. > When the initscripts set the runtime action to be fixup + log, those > faults will actually become more visible to everyone and help detection > and removal of faults overall. As I said, I was suggesting warn rather than fixup+warn for the extra pressure to get such things fixed. I definitely agree with increasing the visibility either way. Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
