On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 10:30 +0000, Andy Green wrote: > On 01/08/11 09:54, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > On 01/08/2011 02:49 AM, Chris Tyler wrote: > > I would like to offer a counter-proposal - no package is accepted into > > Fedora (ARM?) until it stops generating misalignment warnings. That way > > I think your proposal is a bad idea. FWIW I think you're talking at cross-purposes. There's no reason there can't be a policy favoring stuff that doesn't generate miss-alignment warnings (whether outright denial, or just some kind of part of package reviews, and no reason this isn't a generic Fedora problem rather than being ARM specific), have software like abrt pick it up, and still do a fixup+warn setting in the kernel. You won't get silent breakage, and you'll send a message that software needs to be fixed. Jon. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
