On 01/07/11 20:17, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > On 01/07/2011 08:13 PM, Andy Green wrote: > >>> counters haven't increased at all, my guess is that it all happened last >>> night when I was building/testing dietlibc stuff. I'll test that >>> hypothesis when the new kernel is built. >> >> Fine but what has happened with your sha512sum then? > > That didn't cause thousands of errors, only a handful - it wasn't being > used much. The only thing I can think if that could have produced that So both sha512sum binaries are giving correct results now or what? > may alignment errors (and segfaults to go with them, as it happens) was > what I was doing with dietlibc. > >> Is it the case that >> somehow the shared libc in memory is the dietlibc one? Maybe if you >> reboot without touching anything that touches dietlibc you won't see >> this issue again and the whole thing is a painful lesson to leave >> dietlibc the hell alone ^^ > > I don't really see how. As I said, dietlibc is long uninstalled and the > boot-up still trips this 24+1 times. I think the coreutils bug was a > separate one. Now I just need to find what is causing the remaining few > alignment issues. What you should do about that is set alignment=3 on your kernel commandline. That'll then be the default reaction to the alignment fault and it should give some logging about who is the process with the alignment faults. -Andy _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
