Re: Broken sha512sum in coreutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Andy Green wrote:
>> On 01/07/11 16:15, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>>> [root@sheeva ~]# cat /proc/cpu/alignment
>>> User:           12230853
>>> System:         1
>>> Skipped:        0
>>> Half:           0
>>> Word:           0
>>> DWord:          1
>>> Multi:          0
>>> User faults:    0 (ignored)
>>
>> I wrote about the alignment issue here on ARM:
>>
>> http://warmcat.com/_wp/2007/05/25/the-alignment-monster/
> 
> Aha, I know what you are talking about now, and I am aware of such 
> issues. Here is a similar article a friend of mine wrote:
> 
> http://www.altechnative.net/?p=48

Does changing the /proc/cpu/alignment setting from 0 (ignored) to 2 
(fixup) come with a noticeable performance penalty?

Gordan
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux