On 12/30/2010 04:43 AM, omalleys@xxxxxxx wrote: > Quoting Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>: > >> On 12/29/2010 10:39 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: >> >>>>> The plan is to finish 13, do 14, then 15. As I believe some or most of >>>>> the bugs if they are getting pushed upstream should be worked out.? >>>> The point I was making was that by the time we report bugs to the >>>> mainline Fedora, the version of Fedora we are reporting against is >>>> already EOL-ed, because there is such a huge gap betwen a Fedora >>>> release >>>> becoming available for x86 and the ARM rootfs (not even a complete >>>> port) >>>> being available. >>>> >>>> This typically means the bugs immediately get marked as WONTFIX with a >>>> note saying "check the latest release and raise a new bug against that" >>>> - which we can't do because we're too far behind in the ARM land. >>>> >>> >>> Fedora 12 is what's currently available, from a previous ARM port >>> effort. It's not supported anymore. The ARM SIG is targeting F13 (now >>> bootable: >>> http://paulfedora.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/fedora-13-arm-alpha-root-file-system/) >>> >>> and onward. >> >> It seems the metadata is broken on some of the packages in the F13 koji >> repository. The URLs list a host as "hongkong" which is clearly not >> going to resolve. Any chance of a fix? The packages in question are >> pretty important for a usable build system. > > I put it on Paul Whalen blog like a week ago. I just overrode it. > in /etc/hosts put > 142.204.133.150 arm.koji.fedoraproject.org hongkong Hmm... Not so good if you're behind a transparent proxy... :( Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
