On 12/29/2010 10:39 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: >>> The plan is to finish 13, do 14, then 15. As I believe some or most of >>> the bugs if they are getting pushed upstream should be worked out.? >> The point I was making was that by the time we report bugs to the >> mainline Fedora, the version of Fedora we are reporting against is >> already EOL-ed, because there is such a huge gap betwen a Fedora release >> becoming available for x86 and the ARM rootfs (not even a complete port) >> being available. >> >> This typically means the bugs immediately get marked as WONTFIX with a >> note saying "check the latest release and raise a new bug against that" >> - which we can't do because we're too far behind in the ARM land. >> > > Fedora 12 is what's currently available, from a previous ARM port > effort. It's not supported anymore. The ARM SIG is targeting F13 (now > bootable: > http://paulfedora.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/fedora-13-arm-alpha-root-file-system/) > and onward. It seems the metadata is broken on some of the packages in the F13 koji repository. The URLs list a host as "hongkong" which is clearly not going to resolve. Any chance of a fix? The packages in question are pretty important for a usable build system. Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
