On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:36:40PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote: > >> This really might be my ignorance in the ARM world shining, but a big > >> point I would worry about would be power management support that I > >> assume would matter on the versions as they are SOC. But at the same > >> time I don't even know that has to do with the software. Anyone have > >> any insight into this? > > > > Most of these are hardware and architecture independent features > > exposed to userland by the kernel. I.e. the hardware specific details > > of it all are handled entirely inside the kernel (in the ideal case, > > at least). > > So a custom kernel for a device as well as an optimized glibc andl > openssl would most likely be sufficient for those bits as well? (I > think this is where others have been going with their suggestions, I > just want to make sure I "get it") A custom kernel for a device is a basic requirement to get a Fedora userland booting on it. (There are no "one size fits all" kernels in ARM land -- yet.) A custom glibc/openssl would just be optimisations -- the system would work fine with just the stock glibc/openssl packages. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
