On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> >> >> This really might be my ignorance in the ARM world shining, but a big >> point I would worry about would be power management support that I >> assume would matter on the versions as they are SOC. But at the same >> time I don't even know that has to do with the software. Anyone have >> any insight into this? > > Most of these are hardware and architecture independent features > exposed to userland by the kernel. I.e. the hardware specific details > of it all are handled entirely inside the kernel (in the ideal case, > at least). > So a custom kernel for a device as well as an optimized glibc andl openssl would most likely be sufficient for those bits as well? (I think this is where others have been going with their suggestions, I just want to make sure I "get it") -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
