RE: Java status for ARM?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-arm-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-arm-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Haley
> Sent: 29 June 2009 14:44
> To: Peter Lemenkov
> Cc: fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  Java status for ARM?
> 
> Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 
> > Seems that absence of gcj is the most significant difference
> between
> > Fedora-ARM and main Fedora repository. What issues prevents
> gcj from
> > being built? While digging spec-file for GCC, I found
> %bootstrap_java
> > condition - maybe we should simply turn it on? :)
> 
> gcj on ARM is just fine.  If you have any problems building it,
> please
> contact me and Jakub Jelinek.

Wrote: gcc-java-4.4.0-0.34.fa3.armv5tel.rpm :-)

Now for the bootstrap of other java subsystem packages...

> 
> Andrew.
> 

Kedar.


_______________________________________________
fedora-arm mailing list
fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux