On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:13 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:38:25PM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Kedar Sovani <kedars@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch | 13 +++++++++++++
> > rpm.spec | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch
> >
> > diff --git a/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch b/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d59b649
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > +--- rpm-4.6.0-rc1.orig/installplatform 2008-11-30 19:55:59.000000000 -0500
> > ++++ rpm-4.6.0-rc1/installplatform 2008-12-08 18:03:03.000000000 -0500
> > +@@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ for SUBST in $SUBSTS ; do
> > + ISANAME=ia
> > + ISABITS=64
> > + ;;
> > ++ arm*)
> > ++ ISANAME=`echo ${ARCH} | sed "s/\([^-]*\)-.*/\1/"`
> > ++ ISABITS=32
> > ++ ;;
> > + esac
> > +
> > + if [ -n "$MULTILIBNO" ]; then
>
> This looks sane, I suppose. Can you send this to the rpm-maint@
> mailing list and see what they think?
Yes, I did that in the morning :-). Waiting for moderator approval...
Kedar.
_______________________________________________
fedora-arm mailing list
fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm
