On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:38:25PM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kedar Sovani <kedars@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch | 13 +++++++++++++
> rpm.spec | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch
>
> diff --git a/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch b/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d59b649
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +--- rpm-4.6.0-rc1.orig/installplatform 2008-11-30 19:55:59.000000000 -0500
> ++++ rpm-4.6.0-rc1/installplatform 2008-12-08 18:03:03.000000000 -0500
> +@@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ for SUBST in $SUBSTS ; do
> + ISANAME=ia
> + ISABITS=64
> + ;;
> ++ arm*)
> ++ ISANAME=`echo ${ARCH} | sed "s/\([^-]*\)-.*/\1/"`
> ++ ISABITS=32
> ++ ;;
> + esac
> +
> + if [ -n "$MULTILIBNO" ]; then
This looks sane, I suppose. Can you send this to the rpm-maint@
mailing list and see what they think?
_______________________________________________
fedora-arm mailing list
fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm
