> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:46 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > > > Cool! Is there any place that documents the changes necessary for > > 2.3 so that we can also provide a (separate) set of 2.3 rpms for F8? > > Should in theory just be > > http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/patches/workspace.armoabiport01.patch > + > http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/patches/workspace.armeabi01.patch > > Though if OOo fails to register components or start up then you > might need to make additional changes to some makefile.mks that > reference "VERSIONMAP" to reuse the i386 map files for arm, all of > which was fixed up for 2.4. I don't remember if its strictly necessary > to fix that in 2.3 or not. > [RKh] I'v just tried installing the RPM packages; at the beginning it didn't work well until I noticed that the binaries generates lots of unaligned accesses. ARM kernel I'm using doesn't fix that for the user-space by default; so after 'echo 3 > /proc/cpu/alignment' and running soffice and importing a Microsoft word doc I got the following amount of exceptions - -bash-3.2# cat /proc/cpu/alignment User: 125929 System: 0 Skipped: 0 Half: 27982 Word: 21780 DWord: 74940 Multi: 0 User faults: 3 (fixup+warn) Any idea where those unaligned accesses are coming from? Any idea if this can be fixed too? _______________________________________________ fedora-arm mailing list fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm
