Re: Re: Fedora 8/ARM available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:46 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
>
> Cool!  Is there any place that documents the changes necessary for
> 2.3 so that we can also provide a (separate) set of 2.3 rpms for F8?

Should in theory just be

http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/patches/workspace.armoabiport01.patch
+
http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/patches/workspace.armeabi01.patch

Though if OOo fails to register components or start up then you
might need to make additional changes to some makefile.mks that
reference "VERSIONMAP" to reuse the i386 map files for arm, all of
which was fixed up for 2.4. I don't remember if its strictly necessary
to fix that in 2.3 or not.

C.



_______________________________________________
fedora-arm mailing list
fedora-arm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux